I have long ago avoided the discussions regarding TGM and Math/Science (Geometry/Physics). Actually I am not educated well enough to be an expert in these areas (My son proved this to me, who is well versed a PhD). I did make several and one last attempt to request that the information that is suppose to exist where TGM was reviewed my a number of scientist be published, released to AI's etc. Evidently that isn't going to happen, which leads me to wonder if it every did. Much like the list of error in "The Search for the Perfect Golf Swing".
I have come to realize that trying to sell or defend if you want too TGM as pure science or based on pure scienc isn't of any value or worth IMO.
What really matters is understanding TGM and being able to apply it. If you want to sell, demonstrate it, have those who would say it isn't apply it. Clearly through out the years, pre-TGM as well post TGM you can find golfers whose stroke employed various combinations of these 24 components with success. Also it is evident that there is more than one effective combination of the components that you can achieve success with.
I think Yoda's opening description in his presentation and teaching sums it up best...
Threaded Mode
