[Meditation]

Interesting but:

The Wrist Cock occurs in a Vertical Plane of Motion when using a Flat or Bent Left Wrist. As always, we arrive at a Flat and Vertical-ish Left Wrist at Impact. I also occasionally enjoy an ample use of Bent Left Wrist at the End of the Backstroke.

However. The #2 Accumulator is named the "Velocity" Accumulator because the Clubhead moves from point A to point B faster from the #2 Accumulator than with any other Accumulator. It has very little to do with "Around the Circle" Clubhead Speed (10-2-B Grip).

CF Uncocks the Left Wrist and by "Extension" the Clubhead gains Ground Speed. Extension would be the same for both the Flat Uncocking Wrist and the Bent Uncocking Wrist considering both to be Level at Impact. I would assume that the Residual Velocity used by the #3 Accumulator (Throw-out) would be the same given that the Clubhead reaches its Max Speed from Uncocking almost as soon as its released. The #3 PP and Right Forearm guide the Secondary Lever around the Pulley.

Law of the Flail. The Left Wrist is "Flail-Like". It's held to gather with a bolt.

In fact, at Impact, the Left Wrist is Vertical and the Clubhead is traveling/Uncocking "Down-ward" and when the Left Wrist Rolls past Vertical, it's traveling to the Right as it moves from Level to Uncocked. Severe deceleration.

However, Jamie Sadlowski uses the 10-2-D Grip and his Left Wrist is "Totally Bent" at the Top of his Back-stroke. He Uncocks into the Ball. His Wedges are Aligned at 0 degrees and he swings (Clubshaft) on only the Plane of the Right Wrist Bend, The Right Forearm Flying Wedge. Amazing stuff. Look how he bends his Left Elbow to keep the #2 Accumulator on the Plane of the Right Forearm Wedge and thereby keeps the "Pulley" in addition to Uncocking. Homer said that he thinks that Acceleration is another velocity factor. If that's true, then this guy proves it. Jamie isn't only applying the residual Velocity of the #2 Accumulator, he's using all of the Velocity.

But, "Drive for show, putt for dough".

Thanks for sharing your/Homer Kelley's thoughts but none of this is relevant to our discussion.

Let me explain. The initial assertion was that the wrist motion should not be made with the back of the left hand with an inline relationship to the left wrist joint. I'm arguing that it shouldn't. You're arguing that it should. Keep with the conversation.

If you go line by line through your post, you will find nothing directly related to what we're talking about.

Try to respond to the post again or concede the assertion.