[O.B.Left]

First I hope you notice the sit down, centering, stable head and using ground forces in these shots. I still see this is more arm adduction than forearm rotation. Also in Sergio, does he lay off the club at the beginning of start down? ie lose his wrist cup or arch his wrist in addition to everything else he does. More importantly as cool as this is in the baseball swing is this desirable in the golf swing. I don't think so. Shouldn't we keep it simple and on plane. Isn't the shortest point between two lines a straight line. If the club lays on plane at impact and if it is off plane at the top doesn't this require compensations. Should we get rid of the lasers pointing thingys and go to the baseball model. Bucket are you helping or corrupting us?

Yah, my thoughts too. Homer wouldnt change Sergio or Furyk I dont think, not at this point. He believed planar was the simple way to go but the not so simple procedures if repeatable were just as effective mechanically. The "if repeatable" part is the big question. You wouldnt want to teach Furyks swing for instance. You wouldnt build that complicated a machine given simpler options.

That said Im interested in the idea there may be an advantage to the Sergio , Zoro torque move.

That'd make for a mechanical advantage to plane shifting. If so Im in........but to be honest at this point I think, for the golfer anyways, it may feel powerful in that the #3pp is loading a little harder maybe but its not really adding power and is geometrically challenged........ but please .....change my mind. Thats why Im here.

It is weird how the baseball players change planes by about 90 degrees.....way more than a golfer. They dont have to roll a number 3 angle either at impact , the bat has no hooked face. Its a similar motion , interestingly , confusingly ......but not the same deal, exactly.

I dunno. I did play in front of Blue Jays once who were freakin long, crazy long.