[mgolfcz]

Thanks to all,

here is my opinion to my question in relation to your replies ...

1) airair - no, I do not agree with you, I believe that all golf strokes have its own total motion
fyi page 221 of 7th edition - 12-0 says: Chips and Putts are merely miniaturized. And each must have its own Total Motion

2) Daryl - It is interesting point of comparing Curriculum motions to Zones, but ie #14 is first mention in acquired motion, I think you are

not true.

3) Collin Neeman videos - good videos, but there are many errors in his swing such as practice

swing broken left wrist, for acquired motion much #2 accumulator without arms moving up, for full swing poor balance (my observation) and

there is no exact description how to repair or develop correctly, I cant see/hear it

It would be better to see PGA tour TGM videos!

4) O.B.Left is closer to my view on motion curriculum

I think basic motion curriculum (with all 3 stages) is conception/written instruction for learning full golf shot.
To learn full golf shot you must go through all 3 stages to learn all TGM aspects of full golf shot, master stage one go to second and then third. In 12-5 curriculum are some prefixed component variations, because author supposes this is the best way to learn golf shot.

My deduction is this ... the golfer must prepare his/her own curriculum (or take another one from instructor) for other golf shots such as chip.
My idea is ... I will take all components from the basic motion from 12-5-1 (change what I need and practice), then add my stage2 from 12-5-2 and change for my chip shot, from stage2 need for example Weight Shift for my chip curriculum, then practice, then add my stage3 for example elbow position to my chip shot Total Motion.

Do you agree with me ?