[O.B.Left]

Great post OB

can you expound more on this statement, not sure I have heard this before?

-holding the Clubhead on the Target Line.......covering the Target Line as opposed to Tracing the Plane Line with its accompanying Visual Equivalent the Arc or Angle of Approach.

Take a look at 3-F-7-A Steering the Number one malfunction.

And then compare it to the impact geometry of 2-C-1 #2A and #2B both termed the IDEAL APPLICATION. Total compression.

They are in stark contrast. This is the heart and soul of Homers message to my mind. Its all a product of using a club with lie angle and hooked face.

In regard to Type two Steering there is a useful "visual equivalent" to the ideal path of the clubhead. An arc or line on the ground which you can cover visually with the clubhead to great effect, instead of covering the Target line. For this see 2-J-3 the Arc of Approach. Its quite a confusing section but remember that since it is a "visual" these Arcs, Angles or Lines are inscribed on the ground from the point of view of the golfer eyes only.

Simply put, Tracing is to point your #3 pp at the Straight Line Base Line but from a parallax point of view, Covering is to visually cover a line with your clubhead. They are not the same thing. But there is a visual equivalent , an Arc or Angle of Approach which you can Cover to achieve the same clubhead path as if you were Tracing. The Tracing of Straight Line Plane Line has a Visual Equivalent in an Arc a curved line which from your eyes perspective you can cover with the clubhead path.

Its so hard to talk about in words. We need animations. Some day.