[Daryl]

Daryl,
It Physics like come on, open up your mind here.
Your speaking about geometry.
This is a thread is on biomechanics isn't it.
So I'm educating people about biomechanics not geometry.

TGM is about geometric golf not biomechanics.

No mind what data do you have on movement patterns to put forward to prove conservation of momentum doesn't exist please enlighten me I'll all ears.

a golf swing starts from the ground up , just like tennis or baseball, please enlighten me if you have measured data to prove this to be wrong.
I'm not interested in someones word of belief , I want science and facts

Whoa, I'm not criticizing Bio-Mechanics. Far from it. I look forward to learning about your findings. I agree that the Swing should be from the "Ground Up". Completely.

My criticisms are with your belief that TGM is not about Zone 1 (the Pivot) and other of your misrepresentations of TGM concepts.

Additionally you fail to acknowledge that different Delivery Paths are supported by different Pivots. Incompatibility. Circle Path and Straight Line Path do not use the same Pivot. I think that Bio-Mechanics should account for the Players choice. But your quest to find "more Power" disregards much of the subtlety that different Pivots provide. And Zero Pivot is an option.