[Daryl]

Would the Flight Paths be congruent if the Hitter (or manipulated hands swinger) were to adjust his Plane Line to compensate for the open or closed clubface?

Besides the Pull and Push which have not been thus far illustrated; the Slice, Push Slice, Pull Hook and Hook are the ONLY Ball Flights available to a Hitter in which the "Line of Compression" be sustained for a controlled and repeatable procedure. Any other manipulation may and will produce a wide variety of Flight Paths and Trajectories which make distance control a "guesswork" procedure. So, Clubface and ball location changes don't result in more leakage of compression, but as soon as you add a Target Line adjustment, then adjusting Ball Flight is a matter of adding or reducing leakage. It's not the way to lower scores.

Wouldnt balls played back of low point have a lower trajectory due to shaft lean and a longer flight? How bout balls played forward of low point?

All balls are played before Low Point. To Hook the Ball only requires the ball to be played back an inch or so. More for more hook. A slice needs only an inch or so forward of your normal position.

HITTERS are probably much better off playing Push Slices and Pulled Hooks. With very minor plane and clubface re-aligning, the Flight and Trajectories look very much like a Swingers Draws and Fades.

How can you show the Machine Adjustments , Plane Line, Face angle, Ball Position?

Its easy. by tonight.

They cant be congruent can they? The ball played forward will have less shaft lean, the open face will have more effective loft. How do they differ in terms of flight?

Ball location changes of as little as 1 inch can produce significant flight path curves. Clubface alignment changes are equally as sensitive.