LynnBlakeGolf Forums - View Single Post - Your Turn To Prove Thread: Your Turn To Prove View Single Post #1 01-01-1970, 12:00 AM Yoda Administrator Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Atlanta, Georgia Posts: 10,681 Your Turn To Prove brianmanzella wrote: Still no answers.... Below is my response to Brian's quest for "answers" posted on the 24Basic Components / One Ball Location Vs. Multiple thread. It works just aswell here. brianmanzella wrote: Maybe if I use another tack, someone will listen. When Homer wrote the book there was no such thing as sweetspots that all lined up the same. So, an intelligent person, or a non-biased person can plainly see that Homer could not have put it in the book. Yoda, I am not talking about the in-line condition, I am talking about the wedge sweetspot lining up the same as the three irons. So, am I right, does this make a difference that is NOT refered to in the book? Okay, Brian, you are obviously 'dialed in' on this one. Interestingly, when I answer your posts -- and bury your personal opinion withscientific fact -- you promptly disappear. When I don't, you are like the Energizer Bunny. So, once again you demand my time. Well.... Let's let you do the proving for a change... The 3-iron is how long? __________________. The lob wedge is how long? _________________________. The sweet spot differential is _______________________. This makes up for the difference in shaft lengthbecause_____________________________________ __________________________________.If Homer were alive today he would agree with me because, given the above,____________________________________________ _________________________________________________.I said in a prior post that no Aiming Point change was necessary with my 'oneball location' but now I agree that there must be one because___________________________________________ ___________________________. Go for it. brianmanzella wrote: Maybe if I use another tack, someone will listen. When Homer wrote the book there was no such thing as sweetspots that all lined up the same. So, an intelligent person, or a non-biased person can plainly see that Homer could not have put it in the book. Yoda, I am not talking about the in-line condition, I am talking about the wedge sweetspot lining up the same as the three irons. So, am I right, does this make a difference that is NOT refered to in the book? Okay, Brian, you are obviously 'dialed in' on this one. Interestingly, when I answer your posts -- and bury your personal opinion withscientific fact -- you promptly disappear. When I don't, you are like the Energizer Bunny. So, once again you demand my time. Well.... Let's let you do the proving for a change... The 3-iron is how long? __________________. The lob wedge is how long? _________________________. The sweet spot differential is _______________________. This makes up for the difference in shaft lengthbecause_____________________________________ __________________________________.If Homer were alive today he would agree with me because, given the above,____________________________________________ _________________________________________________.I said in a prior post that no Aiming Point change was necessary with my 'oneball location' but now I agree that there must be one because___________________________________________ ___________________________. Go for it. __________________ Yoda Yoda View Public Profile Send a private message to Yoda Visit Yoda's homepage! Find all posts by Yoda