[Mike O]

Doesn't the angle in your 7 example change? The accumulator angle seeks it's inline condition right?

In the real golf swing- absolutely accumulator 4 would release- move- change. That would only send the clubhead down more- i.e. be an offsetting factor for an "up" move. But in my example with the 7, I'm not taking that into account and I am still saying that:
Just because the intersection of the two lines (the lead shoulder in our golfing "machine" example) moves up in relation to the ground- the bottom of the 7 i.e. the clubhead - doesn't necessarily move up.

Again, I read Matthew's post to imply that if the left shoulder was moving up that the clubhead would be moving up and obviously the last half of any downswing shows that not to be true. Likewise the backswing shows that there is not a direct correlation between what the shoulder is doing and what the clubhead is doing i.e. the shoulder goes down in relation to the ground and the clubhead is moving up- for say at least the first half of the backswing if not more.

Hopefully, with all of my posts- Matthew can come back with where he or/and I miscommunicated, made a mistake, took something out of context, etc. As long as we make headway- I don't care what kind of headway it is!