[birdie_man]

Lynn...

That doesn't look "dead center" to me (at the top)....(sorry)...

What happened to "precisely" between the feet? (you said it not me)

It's close...

...

And besides....

Is this not the pic that has been altered?

If it is the original DID have the head further back...

Given, it WAS on a slope....but I think that in itself might just make it to be not be a good picture to judge, period. (and it IS only ONE picture...we need more when it's this close- I think)

What do you think?

....

BTW I realize that "Swaying" is a Snare in The Golfing Machine....and I definitely respecet and hold Homer Kellys 50 (or w/e) years of research in very high value....but lots of great golfers Sway then.....(and hit it with a very high level of precision- and power).

I just don't think that's an overly bad thing. (esp. with a mid-longer club in your hands....or if you're a slicer or learning to pivot)

I mean.....I'm not advocating a LARGE degree of Swaying....cause you can overdo anything....in MY OPINON though....a little is more than fine. (IMO people)

...

I love Homer's work....but I also like to form my own opinions (please no "He did it for 50 years vs. your 10" argument)....and there are tons of options....I think that's important.

...

One more thing I'd like to address...

To me....a perfectly stationary (i.e. no movement at ALL) and CENTERED (between the heels) head IS ideal for a machine...(the book is called "The Golfing Machine"...)....but are people built like machines?

Possible that Homer may not have weighed this (human anatomy) as heavily as he should have? (although there is no doubt that in his 50 years or so of reasearch he thought of it)

What do yall think?

He WAS still researching....

(and you still have options anyway...even according to him)