Originally Posted by pistol
|
Yes this thread has degenerated simply because the whole lot of you can't argue the science. You just make up stuff which is unfortunately absolutely untrue in the scientific community.
Now why dont you argue the science instead or is it just a Boys Club and when you get out of your depth just as was the case with Dr Jeff Mann ( although he was a pain in the butt).
Maybe you just might learn something new from NMGolfer and even if you don't you just may confirm some detail you might not have been convinced of or knew exactly how to arrive at
Science and technology move forward and for sure Homer Kelley would embrace technology etc
|
I have read a lot of science as it relates to the golf swing lately. It has helped my golf game and my teaching exactly zero, zippo, nada. Homer Kelley's work and those who teach it are the people who have helped me play better, and helped me teach better. Good ole boys club? In a lot of ways, that's golf, that's what we are striving to learn.
It seems the focus on science in golf is simply attempting to disprove long standing knowledge and make it their own. It can't be done. It's not all science, it also involves feel and a human machine along with the 6 inches between the ears...
I better stop before I start ranting.
Kevin
Threaded Mode