[12 piece bucket]

This makes good sense.

I'd add that being "on plane" in the backstroke includes any plane shifts. Making Plane Line adherence a constant and giving the golfer some latitude around the fixed , non shifting plane angle. Plane Line compliance being our prime concern.

Im thinking Plane Shifts are hazardous, for sure but;
-you can shift Plane Angles and still be "on Plane". Its the same plane its just shifted. The club still travels the same plane but the angle has shifted. Dang, I wish the 1-L-18 animation would resurface. Imagine yourself in Homers garage set up on his plane board. As you take the club back along the elbow plane Homer begins to tilt the top end of the plane board up to your TSP or whatever, then on the down swing he tilts it down as you approach the Elbow Plane again. Double Shift with your club sliding up and down the single sheet of flat plastic. One end of the club pointing at Plane Line , Base Line at all times.
-one shift is less hazardous than two , two better than three etc
-plane line compliance is the prime concern
-the plane angle through impact had best match the clubs lie angle and ideally the elbow plane for mechanical and geometric advantage. (RFFW and Tracing etc)

Look at this guy here. He is riding Homers plane with a Double Shift. Plane line compliance.

http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/a...d=125440863 6

BEAUTIFUL . . . look at how the right arm and the right shoulder move . . . no bobbing . . . awesome . . . can you put up the next two frames?

I'm going to challenge you on that plane line compliance being of primary importance though . . . disruption in the #3 angle/plane angle shifting CAN have HUGE implications on the face vector AND the rate at which the face rotates about the sweetspot . . .





See anything here that would cause that big ole shift out to the right?