Who said so?

If you can see/measure Head Bobbing, Study Car Crashes, hi-speed Manufacturing Processes, Space Shuttle Launches, etc, from images and/or Video, then any Monkey Can Get Hand Path From Pictures or video. Who needs 1/16" accuracy?

I guess Golf Teachers who use video are trained Monkeys. :laughing9

Simpleton...
 

Daryl

I say so. Anybody with half a brain and has thought about it... says so.

I should not have to (and will not) explain why it is not possible.

You go right ahead and keep deluding yourself

I could care less.

When you get the other half, let's hear what it says.

It's interesting that my Traces coincide with Dr. Nesbits scientific Study. The only difference is that he used 3 hack golfers to develop his incomplete computer model and my method didn't cost a dime using the best Ball Strikers.

I would like to send you and Dr. Nesbit a box of Tissue to wipe away your tears. Would you like your own Box or would you like to share one with Dr. Nesbit?

Daryl ...

You keep that box of tissue. You obviously need it to wipe away all that brown stinky stuff you are so full of.

Ok. you don't get a box of tissue so don't expect one in the mail. I'm sending two boxes to Dr. Nesbit.

The only brown stuff I'm full of is that bullshit study I read by your best friend, Dr. Nesbit.

He takes three hacks and builds a computer model. Now he can teach everyone how to swing a Golf club. How Can You Be So Gullible??

Hundreds of years and 10,000 golf books and thousands of pros and 1,000's of combined years experience on this web-site alone not including the 10's of thousands of others on other web-sites and you post that Dr. Nesbit has found the answer. That's naïve of you. But, I read the study anyway.

Some Engineer gets three grad students to slap on sensors. He captures their hand paths and claims that the hand path of the better golfer is different than the less skilled Golfers. Then he develops a model to predict the outcome of different hand paths on club head speed. SO WHAT?

Is this the Second or Third Website you found to push this stuff on. What did the other web-sites tell ya? Are they "full of it" too?

I'll bet that more money is spent taking photo's and video of the Golf Swing than of Women :laughing9 . That's how much video and photography is available today. Then you say that studying them is pseudo-scientific. Obviously, Millions of people don't agree with you. Listen to yourself. Do you really believe what you say?

In the Golf world, whenever someone says "I found the Answer" (Dr. Nesbit), it's "Snake Oil". There's always people doing it differently and doing it better to prove you wrong. Ya know what's worse? Dr. Nesbit is irrelevant.

The Low Score always wins.

Yup. Clear it and clear it again. Who knew?

Actively driven? Like thrusting driven?

Driven along with the Power Package by the Downstroke Acceleration Sequence. I think it has something to do with the Golden Spiral.

Dont get off topic there Thruster.

NMG - another cool post. You come up with some mad scientist stuff. Thanks.

Maine's new Governor
 

And I was just about to sign your nomination papers.