LynnBlakeGolf Forums

LynnBlakeGolf Forums (http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/index.php)
-   7th Edition Changes (http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=97)
-   -   Stationary Head - To be or not to be (http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=3939)

EdZ 12-08-2006 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrodock
A few inches is the difference between the sweet spot and a shank or even whiff. The difference between compression of the ball and hitting behind the ball. Inches are significant in the golf swing.

That said I think Jim Hardy was onto something when he said those that swing their arms upright (i.e. Watson) would benefit from some weight shift and consequent lateral head movement in the backswing (to give the arms enough time to swing down in the downswing) and those that swing their arms flatter (i.e. Hogan) should keep their weight centered and the head should not move.

As an aside I believe a really upright arm swing plane is less than ideal, but certainly works great for some.

Matt

Not to beat a dead horse... but chin position is a primary reason for that difference. A non-swiveled chin forces the body to move off center in order to complete a full turn with the upright arm swing. Those who swing their arms flatter don't have as much of a 'collision' with the shoulder/chin and/or lesser arm/shoulder turn, so it isn't as big a factor.

birdie_man 12-08-2006 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrodock
A few inches is the difference between the sweet spot and a shank or even whiff. The difference between compression of the ball and hitting behind the ball. Inches are significant in the golf swing.

Yes they are significant....and also are in this. You are right in that sense.

But this goes back to the "is it really that simple?" argument.

i.e. is it that simple that if the "Stationary Post" moves precision is lost? (flat-out)

...

And besides, I only referenced the significance of a few inches in regards to the FEEL of head movement. I was saying that I didn't think the feel was very significant. I think the body position is tho.

It's arguable tho. (both of those points)

Anyway...I have not whiffed in a real long time, I'll tell you that buddy.

Quote:

That said I think Jim Hardy was onto something when he said those that swing their arms upright (i.e. Watson) would benefit from some weight shift and consequent lateral head movement in the backswing (to give the arms enough time to swing down in the downswing) and those that swing their arms flatter (i.e. Hogan) should keep their weight centered and the head should not move.
I don't understand the logic in that.

nuke99 12-09-2006 06:32 AM

Of course , I am not qualified to give any thesis .

But I think golf is a game, where there is no perfect options. To a very huge extend, its Comfort and feel preference, and maybe even Illusions.

As long as you find a way that the shoulder joint to club position have the same position and radius all the time, you hit good balls. John Daly, Jim Furyk.


However, Since you agree that TGM is geometrically correct.

Can you also agree that, The less thing you have to move or monitor is thus less compensation. I think That is the true meaning of what is compensation.

Or kindly explain what is your meaning of compensation, compensating for what we feel? This is the impression i got from your thesis.

The less thing you have to move,
1. The more confident you have to apply maximum lag pressure.
2. The less thing you have to monitor and train. And the more accurate you are from day to day thus less compensation.


Though I remember , something someone said, i think its very deep.

In Pivot controlled hands, Physics Precedes
Hand controlled pivot, Geometry precedes

So I believe, body controlled hands or people trying to use their body to generate power, will like to feel momentum transfer, thus the said phenomenum. Ben hogan pushing the right heel etc.

But at the end of the day. As long as you can strike the way you like it , ball after ball after ball . its your correct way.

Nothing to argue about really and not worth getting confused about.

David Orr didn't mind his students with a slight BOB. Why should us ?

mrodock 12-10-2006 10:24 PM

This video seems to illustrate very well the complications of moving the head: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wN2p...elated&search=

Matt

birdie_man 12-11-2006 01:00 PM

How so M-dog? (can I call u M-dog?...lol)

It shows the head move...doesn't prove anything really tho.

He did have more head movement back then too. (and he did do OK)

mrodock 12-11-2006 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by birdie_man
How so M-dog? (can I call u M-dog?...lol)

It shows the head move...doesn't prove anything really tho.

He did have more head movement back then too. (and he did do OK)


Yeah, I answer to M-dog. Watching this clip is disorientating, and I think it illustrates the amount of compensation necessary by the motor system in order to strike solid golf shots with head movement. Yeah, I'm sure he hit it extremely well. The question is whether the average player is giving up consistency by moving the head. For me personally, this clip is enough for me to try and keep my head as still as possible and feel that I have eliminated one element from my swing that can go wrong.

Certainly for another person this clip will not mean the same as it does to me, I think that's perfectly reasonable. That's the beauty of golf, with a lot of study and work we can design a golf swing that we feel makes sense and hopefully produces excellent results, head movement or not.

birdie_man 12-11-2006 07:44 PM

Kind of.

He DID have quite a bit of head movement back then and I'd say his Pivot these days is better...

...

This video does not give you a true representation of what the Tiger SEES tho.

You have to remember that Tiger's eyes move in the sockets throughout....and they will stay glued on the ball in the Backstroke...

The camera on the other hand only represents how the head moves. The camera basically shows what it would be like if his eyes could only look STRAIGHT out of the face. (so you'd look to the right of the ball as the head sways AND swivels in the Backstroke)

I hope you understand what I'm trying to get across.

...

Try a Pivot like Tiger's and tell me if it's as disorienting as the video might make it seem.

birdie_man 12-11-2006 07:45 PM

BTW as you said if you are having better results with what you're doing then by all means do it.

mrodock 12-12-2006 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by birdie_man



This video does not give you a true representation of what the Tiger SEES tho.

You have to remember that Tiger's eyes move in the sockets throughout....and they will stay glued on the ball in the Backstroke...

The camera on the other hand only represents how the head moves.

You are absolutely right, a complete misunderstanding of what was occurring on my part. Thank you.

Matt

hg 12-12-2006 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by birdie_man
Kind of.

He DID have quite a bit of head movement back then and I'd say his Pivot these days is better...

...

This video does not give you a true representation of what the Tiger SEES tho.

You have to remember that Tiger's eyes move in the sockets throughout....and they will stay glued on the ball in the Backstroke...

The camera on the other hand only represents how the head moves. The camera basically shows what it would be like if his eyes could only look STRAIGHT out of the face. (so you'd look to the right of the ball as the head sways AND swivels in the Backstroke)

I hope you understand what I'm trying to get across.

...

Try a Pivot like Tiger's and tell me if it's as disorienting as the video might make it seem.


Excellent point birdieman...well done!

This makes me think of my own swing that I have been working on more with video...some distressing compensations in my swing that I need to work on...one is head movement on my backswing...I move my head up but it might be due to my head/chin being too close to my body and in the way when my left shoulder attempts to complete a shoulder turn...in order to continue turning my whole body and head raise a bit as I complete the back turn...I am going to work on a preturned head and my chin raised up to accomodate my shoulder turn...my eyes can still be looking down and to the left.

Jeff 04-20-2008 11:49 AM

In reading this thread to learn more about TGM, I noted that Yoda stated in post #53, #56 and #61 that the lower spine moves away from the target at the startup of the backstroke. Surely that is wrong.

Doesn't the lower lumbar spine move towards the target as the golfer pivots over the right femoral head in the backswing?

Here is a diagram showing the movement of the right femoral head in the backswing pivot action - it moves backwards and leftwards. That causes the lumbar spine to move slightly leftwards, although the face-orientation of the lumbar spine becomes increasingly rightwards.



Jeff.

YodasLuke 04-20-2008 06:20 PM

"and don't call me surely"-(Airplane, 1980)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff (Post 52049)
In reading this thread to learn more about TGM, I noted that Yoda stated in post #53, #56 and #61 that the lower spine moves away from the target at the startup of the backstroke. Surely that is wrong.

Doesn't the lower lumbar spine move towards the target as the golfer pivots over the right femoral head in the backswing?

Here is a diagram showing the movement of the right femoral head in the backswing pivot action - it moves backwards and leftwards. That causes the lumbar spine to move slightly leftwards, although the face-orientation of the lumbar spine becomes increasingly rightwards.



Jeff.

It depends on the type of Hip Turn. If you agree with Homer and believe that there should be a Hip Slide or shifting of weight prior to the Hip Turn (10-14-B) and that there's a Stationary Head, then the base of the spine would be moving away from the target in Start Up.

The diagram that you've used would assume no weight shift and a single axis of rotation. (10-14-C)

Jeff 04-20-2008 07:01 PM

Thanks for the reply. Do you know which PGA tour golfers allow their pelvis to slide to the right during the backswing. It is my impression that most PGA tour golfers pivot-rotate around a slightly flexed right knee and don't allow the pelvis to slide to the right. Some, like Ben Hogan, even push their pelvis left-laterally in the late backswing, causing even more left-shift of the lumbar spine, as the following photo series demonstrates.



Jeff.

YodasLuke 04-20-2008 07:56 PM

pictures don't tell the whole story
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff (Post 52056)
Thanks for the reply. Do you know which PGA tour golfers allow their pelvis to slide to the right during the backswing. It is my impression that most PGA tour golfers pivot-rotate around a slightly flexed right knee and don't allow the pelvis to slide to the right. Some, like Ben Hogan, even push their pelvis left-laterally in the late backswing, causing even more left-shift of the lumbar spine, as the following photo series demonstrates.



Jeff.

I appreciate the 3-D of the hips that you posted. But, we are unable to see a 3-D picture of Hogan's hips.

I always have questions about 2-D pictures. Do we know that the camera was on a tripod or was it held? Do we know the distance from camera to golfer? Do we know the wind conditions and the trajectory on which the golfer wanted the ball to travel? Do we know the shot pattern required for the given hole? Do we know that the subjects in the background are standing perfectly still? In making so many assumptions about a couple of pictures, any hypothesis would have a hard time holding water.

It does look like his left hip relative to his fellow competitor has moved to the right, in the second picture. And, that could be attributable to many things.

Yoda 04-20-2008 11:31 PM

Do You See What I See?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff (Post 52049)

In reading this thread to learn more about TGM, I noted that Yoda stated in post #53, #56 and #61 that the lower spine moves away from the target at the startup of the backstroke. Surely that is wrong.

Doesn't the lower lumbar spine move towards the target as the golfer pivots over the right femoral head in the backswing?

Jeff,

Your detailed work is the kind of thing that makes our site work. Thanks!

In reply, I'm sure hg can add the appropriate lines for us, but for now, let's just 'eyeball' Frame 3 of the Hogan sequence. Do you see -- as I do -- the belt-line tilited upwards? And the 'line' of his spine -- up the MIDDLE of his back -- tilted AWAY from the target (as opposed to its vertical position in Frame 1)?


Jeff 04-21-2008 02:22 AM

Yoda - if you are arguing that the general tilt of the lumbar spine is towards the right (away from the target) then I agree with you 100%. That's my mental picture of what happens to the human spine during the backswing pivot action - the junction of the lumbar spine and pelvic sacrum moves slightly leftwards as the right buttocks moves backwards/leftwards, but the frontal spine orientation becomes rightwards oriented so that the entire spine develops a rightwards tilt away from the target.

Here is a photo image of Ben Hogan at the end-backswing position - from the front view. He has a reverse-K look, because although his right thigh is oriented to the left, his spine and upper torso is oriented to the right due to the increased rightwards tilt of the spine that occurs secondary to the movement of the right buttocks leftwards/backwards (that produces a reorientation of the spine to the right).



Jeff.

12 piece bucket 04-21-2008 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff (Post 52063)
Yoda - if you are arguing that the general tilt of the lumbar spine is towards the right (away from the target) then I agree with you 100%. That's my mental picture of what happens to the human spine during the backswing pivot action - the junction of the lumbar spine and pelvic sacrum moves slightly leftwards as the right buttocks moves backwards/leftwards, but the frontal spine orientation becomes rightwards oriented so that the entire spine develops a rightwards tilt away from the target.

Here is a photo image of Ben Hogan at the end-backswing position - from the front view. He has a reverse-K look, because although his right thigh is oriented to the left, his spine and upper torso is oriented to the right due to the increased rightwards tilt of the spine that occurs secondary to the movement of the right buttocks leftwards/backwards (that produces a reorientation of the spine to the right).



Jeff.

That red line ain't exactly where the spine is is it?

Jeff 04-21-2008 10:31 AM

12 piece bucket

When I drew that upper red line, I didn't draw it over the spine. I simply drew it through the middle of the upper torso and through the middle of the head to reflect the general direction of tilt of the upper torso - to demonstrate the reverse-K look. The spine is actually between that upper red line and the yellow line, and the general direction of tilt of the spine is parallel to that upper red line.

Jeff.

12 piece bucket 04-21-2008 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff (Post 52066)
12 piece bucket

When I drew that upper red line, I didn't draw it over the spine. I simply drew it through the middle of the upper torso and through the middle of the head to reflect the general direction of tilt of the upper torso - to demonstrate the reverse-K look. The spine is actually between that upper red line and the yellow line, and the general direction of tilt of the spine is parallel to that upper red line.

Jeff.

I could just be being a doofus which I'm very good at . . . but I'd say the spine is more parallel to the yaller line.

No biggie but that's just me.

holla!

Jeff 04-21-2008 03:15 PM

The spine could be parallel to the yellow line. The yellow line is nearly parallel to the upper red line anyway, and these lines are not meant to be exact representations of body anatomy, but merely illustrative of the reverse-K end-backswing position.

Jeff.

12 piece bucket 04-21-2008 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff (Post 52070)
The spine could be parallel to the yellow line. The yellow line is nearly parallel to the upper red line anyway, and these lines are not meant to be exact representations of body anatomy, but merely illustrative of the reverse-K end-backswing position.

Jeff.

Maybe . . . it looks like that the upper spine has moved somewhat LEFT of its original position much like the post that you put up with the right butt cheek moving BEHIND the player??? Hogan has not created a lot of proverbial "pie."

gmoney_69 04-22-2008 08:50 AM

Monty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff (Post 52056)
Do you know which PGA tour golfers allow their pelvis to slide to the right during the backswing.


Jeff.

Colin Montgomerie.

KOC 05-01-2008 10:29 PM

Is that what Homer talking about?
 
1 Attachment(s)
I am no expert, but it looks alike to me.

jpgolf 09-05-2009 01:46 PM

stationary center
 
See 7-12 . . . I think that should clear up any interpretation issues. The title of the section is Swing Center TRIPOD. The head does't move, but what is UNDERNEATH it may. And in 1-L #1 it says STATIONARY Post (player's head). The post is IMAGINARY . . . It ain't the spine. It is a line drawn up between the feets and up through the mellon. Also see Axis Tilt in the Glossary . . .

Mechanical - To change directions, the helicopter pilot alters the plane of the rotating blades by tilting their axis in the new direction.

Well put!!!

Golf - To change the plane of the Shoulder Turn without moving the Head, the golfer must tilt the Shoulder Axis by moving the Hips.

It all depends on your focus of the "staionary center". I think you can have a stationary head and that becomes a "head centered" pivot .... Colin Montgomery comes to mind. But if the head is to stay centered and I agree with Mr. Blake "set it there and keep it there", the multiple centers and hip shift "tilts" the axis to allow for this (in a dynamic motion).

Flexibility and conditioning and "too flat" of a shoulder turn have adverse effects on keeping this head centered IMO.

jpgolf

Yoda 09-05-2009 07:06 PM

Connecting the 'Swing Center Tripod' Dots
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jpgolf (Post 67491)
See 7-12 . . . I think that should clear up any interpretation issues. The title of the section is Swing Center TRIPOD. The head does't move, but what is UNDERNEATH it may. And in 1-L #1 it says STATIONARY Post (player's head). The post is IMAGINARY . . . It ain't the spine. It is a line drawn up between the feets and up through the mellon.

The term Swing Center Tripod is found only in the title of 7-12 (the Pivot Component) of the 7th edition. Unfortunately, there is no expanation or reference to this important concept in 7-12. Thus, there is an unfortunate 'disconnect' here, in that the explanation of the SCT can be found only in 2-H (also only in the 7th edition):
The important thing is that the true Swing Center for ALL COMPONENTS is around a Hinge Pin with one end at the top of the Stationary Head and the other in the ground, precisely between the Feet, with no regard for Body Location or Position at any time.
:salut:

slicer mcgolf 09-05-2009 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 67497)
The term Swing Center Tripod is found only in the title of 7-12 (the Pivot Component) of the 7th edition. Unfortunately, there is no expanation or reference to this important concept in 7-12. Thus, there is an unfortunate 'disconnect' here, in that the explanation of the SCT can be found only in 2-H (also only in the 7th edition):
The important thing is that the true Swing Center for ALL COMPONENTS is around a Hinge Pin with one end at the top of the Stationary Head and the other in the ground, precisely between the Feet, with no regard for Body Location or Position at any time.
:salut:

Would this hingepin not be bottomed out at or near low point rather than 'precisely between the feet'?

I have always viewed this swing center being slightly left of center...

Yoda 09-05-2009 10:57 PM

Pivot Center Versus Low Point
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by slicer mcgolf (Post 67502)
Would this hingepin not be bottomed out at or near low point rather than 'precisely between the feet'?

I have always viewed this swing center being slightly left of center...

In every Golf Stroke, there is a Pivot Center (even when the Pivot is zeroed) and an Arm Swing Center. Respectively, these are the Head (or, if preferred, the 'Point-between-the-Shoulders') and the Left Shoulder.

The Pivot Center lies between the feet. The Low Point (of the Arm Swing) lies opposite the Left Shoulder.

:)

groverw 11-11-2009 09:49 PM

Head in the vertical dimension
 
I'm a newb with a stationary head question. Snead is mentioned many times in the thread, one of his traits is the so-called "squat" on the downswing. The "squat" move is now highlighted in Tiger swing analyses.
I wonder how the so-called squat doesn't lower the head vertically?
I accept that a head bob or sway is counterproductive, and would like some informed opinion.
Thanks

O.B.Left 11-11-2009 10:18 PM

Welcome groverw.

Great question too, Ill be interested in the answers you get. Lots of great players with squats. Although most didnt start from Impact Fix but rather some place a little higher up.

Id say that Tigers head was for sure dropping with that big squat. Especially with the driver. His radius, his left shoulder to ball distance was changing dynamically. Low point was lowering. But he doesnt establish his radius at Impact Fix.

Hogan got pretty close to Fix but had some squat. Lyn's got some squat.

Is a little squat a good thing? Can you squat and keep the radius properly measured?

O.b.

12 piece bucket 11-12-2009 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by groverw (Post 68871)
I'm a newb with a stationary head question. Snead is mentioned many times in the thread, one of his traits is the so-called "squat" on the downswing. The "squat" move is now highlighted in Tiger swing analyses.
I wonder how the so-called squat doesn't lower the head vertically?
I accept that a head bob or sway is counterproductive, and would like some informed opinion.
Thanks

1. That squat move shows up in most players who can really bust the ball . . . forces DOWN into the ground and then push UP off the ground . . . like grabbing a rebound . . .

2. That move also helps you get the club coming down the face of the plane delaying the hip rotation

3. Eldrick may accentuate this move due to his set up. He sets up with his neck and back all straight and probably does this move some so he can get the ball focused with his eyes when he makes his down stroke.

okie 11-12-2009 01:45 PM

Adams Scott does point #3. Practically looks down his cheek bones. Maybe he needs more elsquatto! Bucket, Tiger is always presented as the paragon of posture. Do you think the straight neck is more form than function?

O.B.Left 11-12-2009 07:03 PM

Where are his eyes at impact though? Id bet not looking down his cheek bones. I think Homer would want your eye line at impact previewed in fix too, no? So I vote for Form or misguided function maybe.

And agreed its nice have Bucket back posting, he is an expert on this subject. Why just the other day Daryl was saying Bucket new squat. He did, I heard him. Daryl is so kind sometimes.

So Bucket, what are the implications to the radius, bobbing etc when you squat. Do you have to unsquat prior to impact?

Daryl 11-12-2009 07:51 PM

Okie,

Will you take that wooden pot stirring spoon away from O.B.?


GPStyles 11-12-2009 08:02 PM

woah!

I'm getting deja vu all over again!

This is what caused Daryl's 'meltdown' on Lag Erickson's site!

When is a stationary head not stationary!

lol!

O.B.Left 11-12-2009 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.B.Left (Post 68882)
So Bucket, what are the implications to the radius, bobbing etc when you squat. Do you have to unsquat prior to impact?



Dudes I fear that maybe my humourisms might be taken the wrong way. I do honestly value Buckets ground force knowledge and my question is an earnest one.

Daryl you know squat too, maybe you could add something here?

Ob

Daryl 11-12-2009 10:10 PM

Squat is a Vertical Downward Force. It takes the Hands from a Steeper Plane to an Elbow Plane; Always.

It lowers the Head. What goes up must go down, then Up again.

The Squat is a Position, destination. The Sit-down is an Alignment and it's not a destination.

The Squat is timed with the Arm Drop to the Elbow Plane. The Squatter, Squats to Pull the Hands to the Elbow Plane, and waits for the Elbow position to get to release. Then the Squatter uses his legs to thrust and throw his right forearm into the Impact Zone. I like it best when it's followed by flinging the clubhead from the wrist through Impact. The #3 pressure point monitors and coordinates the procedure, not the plane line. It reminds me of a two handed forearm smash in Tennis.

groverw 11-12-2009 11:23 PM

Thanks for the head-squat answers
 
O.B., Daryl, Bucket and Okie;
thanks for sharing your opinions so quickly! Good stuff.
As to a swing center, I guess the squatter can still maintain a still head in two dimensions.

I think this site is the single greatest forum on golf. My mailbox has been filling up with commercial golf magazine subscription offers and I couldn't care less.

Yoda 11-12-2009 11:24 PM

TGM's Stationary Head
 
Homer Kelley viewed the Stationary Head as a geometric ideal, not as a mechanical absolute.

He recognized our humanity.

Hence, his advice:

"Just keep it as still as you can."

:salut:

12 piece bucket 11-12-2009 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by okie (Post 68881)
Adams Scott does point #3. Practically looks down his cheek bones. Maybe he needs more elsquatto! Bucket, Tiger is always presented as the paragon of posture. Do you think the straight neck is more form than function?













Who can see? Compare the upper spines and who gots the bobbing for apples faces . . . being able to see is a pretty big deal.

12 piece bucket 11-13-2009 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.B.Left (Post 68899)
Dudes I fear that maybe my humourisms might be taken the wrong way. I do honestly value Buckets ground force knowledge and my question is an earnest one.

Daryl you know squat too, maybe you could add something here?

Ob

Here's you some unsquatin . . .















All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:11 PM.