![]() |
I just read Mr. Erickson's comments on Hitting vs. Swinging in reference to Mr. Knudsen...
Mr. Erickson looks at hitting vs. swinging the same way as does MORAD. Hitting = CP Swinging = CF I'm not saying right, wrong, indifferent. Not my place... I'm here to learn Homer Kelley's version of TGM, and find it confusing when debates are centered around other methods that really don't apply to my copy of The Golfing Machine. This is THE PLACE to learn and understand Mr. Kelley's work by THE MASTER of it's ideals. If you want to learn others teaching methods there are websites to do so. Just my opinion. Kevin |
Quote:
It makes sense to me that some pro's who possessed educated hands would teach Pivot to Hands or passive hands to the new golfer. Proper hand motion, swinging the Hands instead of the club head etc was not well enough understood back then or now for that matter. But to keep this train on the Knudson rails, in your opinion, how would Knudson "fire" his hands? Its an interesting question and Ill tell you why I ask. I remember a friend of mine who had a summer long series of group lessons with George at the National Golf Club just north of Toronto. He was a pretty good golfer and was in with some beginners. By the end of the summer George had them all hitting beautiful , perfect little mid irons with a three quarter swing. They didnt go very far but they were sweet. My friend was somewhat frustrated that the lessons never progressed past this shot. It was a swing that George didnt use himself, even when doing demonstrations for the class and neither did my friend when he was playing for score. He'd bring it out once in a while when he was goofing around. It was a often a 130 yard seven iron floater. George could get most any person hitting it and accurately. Perhaps there was more to be had from George's lessons after many many reps or perhaps there was a missing bridge between Pivot to Hands and educated Hands? George wrote a beautiful book which is largely about the Pivot. Jack in his book called the hands the "great destroyers". Homers book is about the Hands and their correct usage. Its not a "handsy" method but it is about the Hands. Homer "wrote the book" on Hands. |
I don't think that HK was against using the Wrists. He did say that the muscles of the Forearms "Are Available" to uncock the Left Wrist. On the other hand, references about using the procedure are nonexistent in the book.
Quote:
|
Quote:
Homer listed the 10-20 (RELEASE) TRIGGER TYPES in a manner which corresponded approximately to their Release Point 11-24, Full Sweep, Random Sweep, Snap and Flip. See 10-20-A THE HAND THROW, which could be employed in a Non-Automatic (active) manner for a Full Sweep Release. Or 10-20-E WRIST THROW. Which when done in a 10-24-D Non-Automatic Snap Release manner would produce a very late Snap release point, a smaller pulley wheel (Endless Belt Analogy) for added power. So Homer's Hands, I guess, arent necessarily "passive" in all of the several trillion effective stroke patterns he catalogued and he and Prof Jorgensons would appear to be in conflict about the effectiveness of an "active wrists release". If I read your quote above correctly. Also Homer does in 10-20-0 suggest the existence of non listed Trigger Types, "X" classifications which might include Lags "firing" hands, maybe? I Dunno. |
I only said that HK wasn't against using them. Actually, he only said that they "Are Available". Your Putter "is available" it hit a Tee Shot too.
I'm sure he was referring to scooping the ball out of the cup or some such similar situations. :laughing9 |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 PM. |