LynnBlakeGolf Forums

LynnBlakeGolf Forums (http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/index.php)
-   The Golfing Machine - Basic (http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Standard Hip Action vs. Delayed Hip Action (http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=8528)

12 piece bucket 12-02-2011 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 88477)
Whip,

With love in my heart, I write this Open Letter to you.

Scrolling through all the posts in this thread, there is no doubt that you have a wonderful understanding . . . of all you understand. You also skillfully articulate that understanding and defend it with passion. Bravo!

But . . . you also have a big missing piece. (Please don't take this last statement and the 'point-counterpoint' in this thread personally; it is how we learn.) And that missing piece was the subject of my first post here (#5); specifically, the Hitter's Angle of Approach Procedure (2-J-3 / B). It is this procedure that necessitated -- indeed required in Homer Kelley's own case -- the Pre-Turned Right Hip.

The Angle of Approach procedure and its derived Angle of Approach Plane Angle dictated that a more "inside" Path be made for the Hands in the Backstroke. That Path had nothing to do with Standard Hip Turn (Hips leading Shoulders) or Delayed Hip Turn (Shoulders leading Hips) or whatever. It had solely to do with Homer Kelley realizing that he had to pre-clear his own Right Hip so that his Hands could take the very Steep (but Inside) Backstroke Path. In so doing , the Clubhead could then COVER (not 'Point at' or 'Trace') the Angle of Approach Plane Line.

And COVERING the Angle of Approach (with the Clubhead) is what the Angle of Approach procedure is all about. If the Clubhead merely 'points' at the Angle of Approach (to the originating, geometric 10-5-A Plane Line), then you would be Tracing it, as if it were a 'normal' Closed Plane Line (10-5-E) with its own unique Angle of Approach (and Attack). And that ain't the case: The Angle of Approach Plane retains the identical Impact and Low Points of the original Geometric Plane Line. As Homer so eloquently (and to most readers, mysteriously) stated in the 6th edition, "There is no Angle of Approach to an Angle of Approach procedure . . . " .

That last quote is not in your book (I understand you have the 4th edition). Nor is it in the 5th. In fact, Section 2-J-3, the player's Visual Equivalents of the true On Plane Angle of Attack and Arc of Attack, did not even exist in the first three editions of The Golfing Machine. These were the things, Homer would say, that "seeped through slowly". As the Good Lord gave him more time, he wrote them down.

Section 2-J-3 was introduced in the 4th edition and revised extensively over the next four years in the 5th and 6th editions. Still, he wasn't satisfied, and he continued to tweak the verbiage. A final version (transcribed from revisions he left) appeared in the 7th edition, 23 years after his death. None of the information in the earlier editions was wrong, it was just that Homer tried desperately in so many different ways to get the same points across to us . . . points that to him seemed so self-evident and simple, but which he learned we simply could not understand.

Personally, I think mastery of the two Visual Equivalents and their two procedures (Swinger's Arc of Approach and Hitter's Angle of Approach) requires an understanding of Section 2-J-3 in each of the editions 4, 5, 6, and 7. If you don't have those editions, well, you don't have them. One more reason to search my archives.

Putting a red ribbon around our personal give-and-take over the last couple of days, the Pre-Turned Right Hip is not so much a Delayed Hip Action procedure as it is an enabling Angle of Approach procedure.

For 'the rest of us' -- if you've read this far -- I know this post sounds like a bunch of gobbledygook. To which I can only say, in its defense, that it is correct and that it will be worthwhile to those whose journey takes them there. Knowing that, I can sleep. Otherwise . . .

I've wasted an hour of my life.

:salut:

RED MEAT......Rich fatty caramelized seasoned perfectly.....beautiful stuff here....

YOU HAVE NOT WASTED AN HOUR OF YOUR LIFE....YOU HAVE DELIVERED THE VERY BASIS OF THE SYSTEM THAT IS THE GOLFING MACHINE ....PERFECTLY!!! AS USUAL NO DOUBT!!! GREAT POST....

PIGGY BACKING HERE....

The thing to keep in mind in all this...for the hands to go IN (as stated above particularly in an angle of approach procedure)...the right hip MUST "get outta the way" ...IMO EARLY....this is the beauty of what Homer was systematizing....IN HOMER'S MIND THE EARLIEST WOULD BE....BEFORE THE HIP IS SET "IN MOTION"....Some will achieve the required depth "dynamically"...depth as required by the selected delivery line and/or plane angle...

remember ALL GEOMETRY STEMS FROM IMPACT GEOMETRY.....hence the crucial importance of 2-J-3....the sweetspot is executing a DIFFERENT MOTION IN A HITTING VS. SWINGING PROCEDURE...therefore your delivery lines and hand paths are necessarily different....another factor is the plane angle....essentially the lines in your 2-J-3 Ben Doyle-ish mat on the ground are dictated a. by your procedure b. selected delivery line c. plane angle....so as the plane angle steepens and flattens the delivery lines and hand path NECESSARILY CHANGE...which also implies a change in the pivot....that is why the pictures of the King are sooooooooooo sexy....beautiful GEOMETRY....his swing in his younger days was very much unappreciated....this cat wasn't just a brute....he had HOT lines....



I doubt Palmer had a clue about his procedure....BUT his geometry arrived at likely spontaneously rather than systematically is beautifully compliant with 2-J-3 Angle of Approach Hitting Procedure....Homer states that the pivot is to comply with the delivery line....

Note how AP's shoulder lines, right hip depth in connection to the left knee line and his left arm all are approximately parallel and in my mind ...RELATED TO THE ANGLE OF APPROACH...

Note the standard knee action...allowing the right hip to reach deep....to tilt the hip girdle...tilt the shoulders...achieving a relationship that to me is related to the angle of approach delivery line....

Even his neck and head seem to be tilted such that his eye line is compliant with the angle of approach...

Note the primary lever assembly's (left arm and club)relationship to the right shoulder (back stop in the hitting procedure)...truly an uncompensated alignment from which the right forearm and pivot can LAUNCH/DRIVE OUT...the sweetspot....

Note the beautiful level right wrist (don't so much like the archy left wrist but nobody is perfect)....the hitter being reliant on ALIGNMENTS cannot afford to have a slack laden set of flying wedges...no double cocked slingy wedges...the swinger can get away with it...not the hitter...with his simultaneous release he can't have no double cocked right wrist that he has to wait for cf to line up....very much like keeping the left arm UNDER the right shoulder...no wasted space,motion or slack....lines very much compliant to the selected delivery and release type required to execute the selected hitting procedure...can't count on old cf to help you line up your junk...better have your alignments correct ... the throw out of the sweetspot is "IN YOUR HANDS" literally and figuratively...you won't be getting an assisted from a cf palm to plane karate chop...3 stage rocket release....you got them batteries connected and the firing is happening all at the same time...no building up in this release type.

AP's hands are DEEP...allowing for the Sweetspot to be delivered out to the plane line at a faster rate than the swinger due to the SIMULTANEOUS RELEASE TYPE COMPLIANT with the Hitting Procedure...this is why NO MIXING....the sweetspot is driven out and off the face of the plane EARLIER...so as not to "come over the top"...the handpath is necessarily more inward in the Angle of Approach procedure...the elbow IS NOT PITCHED...it is PUNCH...there fore compliant with the required release type to comply with Hitting.

The left arm striving for depth as dictated by the angle of approach's INWARD direction...the left arm (top leg of the primary lever) NEVER ABOVE THE RIGHT SHOULDER...

THE DUAL AGENT IN THE POWER PACKAGE....ALLOWING THE ABILITY OF THE RIGHT SHOULDER TO MAN HANDLE THE LEFT ARM...LAUNCHING THE PRIMARY LEVER DOWN PLANE IN RELATION TO THE ANGLE OF APPROACH...WITH THE LEFT ARM NEVER RISING ABOVE THE RIGHT SHOULDER(DUAL AGENT..PART OF PIVOT AND POWER PACKAGE) THERE IS CONSIDERABLY LESS "SPACE", "SLACK", "TIME", "MOTION" TO "MAKE UP"....THE HITTER FROM THIS ALIGNMENT CAN IMMEDIATELY BEGIN TO DRIVE THE SWEETSPOT DOWN AND OUT ON PLANE....the clubhead never falling behind the hands as in swinging....

note the comparative lack of depth in the right hip in Toms and Eldrick....Primary Lever ...lifted up...less deep...set up for a delivery line that is the geometric plane line...thus better set up to swing...



Note the picture of Robert Garrett (OLYMPIC DISCUS CHUCKER IN EARLY 1900'S)....preparing to LAUNCH the discus....he would NEVER allow the mass of the discus to rise ABOVE his right shoulder...the mass well below the right shoulder as to have NO SLACK in the system...therefore he can recruit his PIVOT to DRIVE the discus down plane....in studying discus throwing....some of their focus is on LOW POINT...otherwise the discus would be launched too high and out to the right....

Instinctive genius of the King....Systematic Genius of Homer Kelley....

I have been having some FAN-FREAKIN'-TASTIC YELLOW BOOK CONVERSATION ON THIS WITH THE EVIL GENIUS MECHANIC...EDDIE COX....IT MAY JUST BE TIME FOR ANOTHER PINEHURST REUNION????????????......HMMMMMMM?????????????

whip 12-02-2011 09:29 AM

Not done yet...
 
why does homer recommend delayed hip action for his swingers basic pattern and not standard hip action? Surely he is not using the the preturned hip, which is an angle of approach enabler(hitting). Wouldn't the shoulders leading the hips fit more with a carry back hitters procedure? Whereas swingers with their swing away would seem more fitting to use standard hip action.

Ps Arnold Palmer and Tommy gainey probably two of the most incredible motions ever to be seen on the PGA tour highly underrated. I thought toms was a hitter who went on to end.

12 piece bucket 12-02-2011 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whip (Post 88482)
why does homer recommend delayed hip action for his swingers basic pattern and not standard hip action? Surely he is not using the the preturned hip, which is an angle of approach enabler(hitting). Wouldn't the shoulders leading the hips fit more with a carry back hitters procedure? Whereas swingers with their swing away would seem more fitting to use standard hip action.

Ps Arnold Palmer and Tommy gainey probably two of the most incredible motions ever to be seen on the PGA tour highly underrated. I thought toms was a hitter who went on to end.

I got the 4th in my office...so I'm not sure if the patterns have changed based on whatever edition you may reference as far as the patterns in chapter 12....BUT....my assumption would be based on the patterns....the plane line is square square....the handpath is therefore more "straight away" for both patterns...I think delayed works better with the less depth in the geomeotric plane line delivery as opposed to an angle of approach delivery....angle of approach delivery is VERY DIFFRENT (and in my mind superior for Hitting) than a geometric plane line delivery....problem: Homer didn't leave us with a component list for an angle of approach procedure...it would certainly be interesting for somebody (maybe a certain tiny green somebody) to develop that listing....I think the components would necessarily be different...it would be an instructive undertaking for sure...

not sure if that answers your questions...BUT...remember Homer was very much not in favor of RECOMMENDING ANYTHING....so I imagine it was difficult for him to be "pigeon holed" into being restricted to the patterns in chapter 12.

whip 12-02-2011 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket (Post 88484)
I got the 4th in my office...so I'm not sure if the patterns have changed based on whatever edition you may reference as far as the patterns in chapter 12....BUT....my assumption would be based on the patterns....the plane line is square square....the handpath is therefore more "straight away" for both patterns...I think delayed works better with the less depth in the geomeotric plane line delivery as opposed to an angle of approach delivery....angle of approach delivery is VERY DIFFRENT (and in my mind superior for Hitting) than a geometric plane line delivery....problem: Homer didn't leave us with a component list for an angle of approach procedure...it would certainly be interesting for somebody (maybe a certain tiny green somebody) to develop that listing....I think the components would necessarily be different...it would be an instructive undertaking for sure...

not sure if that answers your questions...BUT...remember Homer was very much not in favor of RECOMMENDING ANYTHING....so I imagine it was difficult for him to be "pigeon holed" into being restricted to the patterns in chapter 12.

Homer listed delayed hip action for the swingers basic pattern in the 4th 5th 6th and 7th editions, Homer layed out the basic patterns as a starting point, a recommended example, there must be a reason why delayed hip action was chosen over standard. My opinion is that because delayed is lead by the shoulders in the backstroke this variation would tend to prevent overswinging as he says vs. A swing that is lead by the hips is probably more conducive to a maximum swing radius. When looking at the rest of the components for the swingers basic pattern at least in the 5th edition he uses flat left foot action and right anchor, two components that will limit the range of motion vs. Standard foot action and standard knee action which would or could produce maximum swing radius. So as you mince your way through G.O.L.F. You may be able to lengthen the swing but it is first recommended to use a swing with emphasis on a shorter swing radius, a more anchored swing.

12 piece bucket 12-02-2011 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whip (Post 88485)
Homer listed delayed hip action for the swingers basic pattern in the 4th 5th 6th and 7th editions, is the hitters basic pattern not a component list for the angle of approach procedure? Homer layer out the basic patterns as a starting point, a recommended example, there must be a reason why delayed hip action was chosen over standard

I don't have 6 and 7 here....but plane line is square square for both in minez.....AOA requires CLOSED...if my recollection is correct...would make sense to me anyhow...So have a look AOA in the 6th I believe REQUIRES the 10-5-E plane line stance line combo....

Not sure what edition and this was discussed out here in the day...there was a pattern that Homer had in one of the earlier editions I think 3 or 5 maybe that had the grip type as 10-2-D rather than 10-2-B....that pattern MAY HAVE BEEN the 10-5-E pattern...not sure though.

12 piece bucket 12-02-2011 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whip (Post 88485)
Homer listed delayed hip action for the swingers basic pattern in the 4th 5th 6th and 7th editions, Homer layed out the basic patterns as a starting point, a recommended example, there must be a reason why delayed hip action was chosen over standard. My opinion is that because delayed is lead by the shoulders in the backstroke this variation would tend to prevent overswinging as he says vs. A swing that is lead by the hips is probably more conducive to a maximum swing radius. When looking at the rest of the components for the swingers basic pattern at least in the 5th edition he uses flat left foot action and right anchor, two components that will limit the range of motion vs. Standard foot action and standard knee action which would or could produce maximum swing radius. So as you mince your way through G.O.L.F. You may be able to lengthen the swing but it is first recommended to use a swing with emphasis on a shorter swing radius, a more anchored swing.

I think you are sniffing it....HOWEVER....some of the precision in this analysis is lost in the PLANE ANGLE and procedure type..."length" is a nebulous concept in my mind....TSP hands go HIGH and less DEEP...Elbow plane hands go DEEP and less high....I depending on the amount the power package is "lifted"...you COULD HAVE a really "long" swing with high hands and MAJOR hip turn in some ways allowed by standard knee action...or you could have a "short" swing with major hip turn ala Ken Venturi...one component Homer didn't make complete allowances for (other than axis tilt) is deviations in the flexibility of the spine...

whip 12-02-2011 10:39 AM

Yes, correct angle of approach uses closed stance line, ...that is why I deleted that sentence. Maybe it is not the overall length that is the important factor but rather the live tension that is more easily noticed with a restriction to a motion (which would be conducive to shorter overall swing radius), such is the case with flat left foot action, right anchor and delayed hip action. I think the key is that in 10-15-b he says "tighten the left side tension and set the stage perfectly for the hips to initiate the downstroke shoulder acceleration." Which is a very crucial moment and concept when swinging. 10-19-c drag loading wants you to launch the right shoulder down plane via the hips, and as homer states delayed hip action can set the stage perfectly for this.

whip 12-02-2011 11:12 AM

Of course the application must still be there, but discussing this stuff I feel my swing has improved without even picking up a club, as homer said you can do a lot of learning in your armchair. This is the beauty of the yellow book. By simply reading and studying a subject that information is absorbed into the computer, upgrading your album instantly.

KevCarter 12-02-2011 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket (Post 88484)
I got the 4th in my office...so I'm not sure if the patterns have changed based on whatever edition you may reference as far as the patterns in chapter 12....BUT....my assumption would be based on the patterns....the plane line is square square....the handpath is therefore more "straight away" for both patterns...I think delayed works better with the less depth in the geomeotric plane line delivery as opposed to an angle of approach delivery....angle of approach delivery is VERY DIFFRENT (and in my mind superior for Hitting) than a geometric plane line delivery....problem: Homer didn't leave us with a component list for an angle of approach procedure...it would certainly be interesting for somebody (maybe a certain tiny green somebody) to develop that listing....I think the components would necessarily be different...it would be an instructive undertaking for sure...

not sure if that answers your questions...BUT...remember Homer was very much not in favor of RECOMMENDING ANYTHING....so I imagine it was difficult for him to be "pigeon holed" into being restricted to the patterns in chapter 12.

Another in a long line of great post Bucket!

Didn't Homer Kelley just consider the patterns in Chapter 12 as a starting point and expect us ALL to take them in different directions? I am very fond of that approach. Keeps it very simple when starting out, and lots of OPTIONS as we become more advanced.…

Kevin

Par71 12-02-2011 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket (Post 88481)
The thing to keep in mind in all this...for the hands to go IN (as stated above particularly in an angle of approach procedure)...the right hip MUST "get outta the way" ...IMO EARLY....this is the beauty of what Homer was systematizing....IN HOMER'S MIND THE EARLIEST WOULD BE....BEFORE THE HIP IS SET "IN MOTION"....

Great stuff, 12pb. Love those pictures.

Just to make sure I understand you correctly...

Are you suggesting that a player using a Hitter's Angle of Approach procedure with Top alignments like the King in your pictures PRETURN HIS HIPS as far as illustrated in these pictures before the backstroke motion (Start Up) starts?

whip 12-02-2011 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Par71 (Post 88491)
I find Standard Hip Action to be conducive of a Shoulder Turn Takeaway. That "perceptible slackness in the Hip and Shoulder relationship", which Lynn referred to above, can IMO easily cause the Hands to move back too low and too much inside.

That's not saying that you cannot produce wonderful Swings with Standard Hip Action. And I agree that the slackness in the Hip/Shoulder relationship seems to fit the Swinger's pattern, particularly the Dragging Clubhead Takeaway. But much more difficult to master than Delayed Hip Action.


Nice....

But why are you implying that standard hip action which is described as actuating the shoulders in both directions has a "perceptible slackness..." when in fact he makes the distinction between zero hip action and standard with the following description

"10-15-ZERO HIP ACTION except with zero hip turn, this can resemble standard hip action above, but there is usually a perceptible slackness between the hip and shoulder relationship in both directions, the motion is a hip turn only, not a true action in either direction"

Unlike Standard hip action in which there is not a slackness because the hips are actuating the shoulders both ways, it is a true action in both directions

Par71 12-02-2011 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whip (Post 88496)
But why are you implying that standard hip action which is described as actuating the shoulders in both directions has a "perceptible slackness..."

I stand corrected. I do not have a book in front of me right now and was only quoting from Lynn's post. I thought Lynn was referring to Standard Hip Action with that "perceptible slackness" while he was probably referring to Zero Hip Action if that is where the term is used in the book. I would not have used that expression on my own. I shall better look in the book next time before I post.:eyes:

The point I was trying to make is that the dragging effect that Standard Hip Action has on the Shoulders can lead to a Shoulder Turn Takeaway.

12 piece bucket 12-02-2011 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whip (Post 88488)
Yes, correct angle of approach uses closed stance line, ...that is why I deleted that sentence. Maybe it is not the overall length that is the important factor but rather the live tension that is more easily noticed with a restriction to a motion (which would be conducive to shorter overall swing radius), such is the case with flat left foot action, right anchor and delayed hip action. I think the key is that in 10-15-b he says "tighten the left side tension and set the stage perfectly for the hips to initiate the downstroke shoulder acceleration. Which is a very crucial moment and concept when swinging. 10-19-c drag loading wants you to launch the right shoulder down plane via the hips, and as homer states delayed hip action can set the stage perfectly for this.

Yes sir....BUT....(you are doing a nice job in your analysis by the way)...in the "ideal" of the "uncompensated stroke" (not fully defined by Homer)...the pattern(S)ideally would be constructed so the ALL components match the procedure and the selected delivery line and release type and plane angle....from there you start building your "battleship" as opposed to your canoe. So crap matches some crap don't...but to me it would all depend on the "biggies" and follow from there...for the uncompensated...but if you wanna "do anything" obviously you can tour pros can...but since we is trying to systematize...some things is better'n other thangs....at least as far as easy of producing ball flight with an economy of motion....could be why Homer was a self described HITTING afficionado...procedure dependent on superior alignments...

12 piece bucket 12-02-2011 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Par71 (Post 88494)
Great stuff, 12pb. Love those pictures.

Just to make sure I understand you correctly...

Are you suggesting that a player using a Hitter's Angle of Approach procedure with Top alignments like the King in your pictures PRETURN HIS HIPS as far as illustrated in these pictures before the backstroke motion (Start Up) starts?

Sure....Eddie Cox has developed something along these lines I believe to be a FANTASTIC HITTING pattern....you pre-turn the hips in an amount to approximate the angle of approach...which is basically approximated by your on plane right forearm at address...so in your LOOK LOOK LOOK process you are observing with the pre-turn...the line from your left knee to right hip joint is approximately parallel to the angle of approach 2-J-3 style on the ground....this 3-D imaginary line approximates the direction of your backstroke hand path....those King lines are the MODEL TOP for this particular pattern (less "visually flat left wrist" though ...more geometrically flat). But if you look at the King...he achieved these alignments more in dynamic fashion...but I think it would be much easier with the pre-turn to establish these lines at address...that's where you is going...so why not start there...then all of your path/delivery is right there for you to LOOK LOOK LOOK at...you have an approximation of "this is the path my hands must travel on". GOOD STUFF....

Par71 12-02-2011 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket (Post 88499)
you pre-turn the hips in an amount to approximate the angle of approach...which is basically approximated by your on plane right forearm at address

At Address or at Impact Fix (which, of course, could be one and the same if you're using Impact Address)?

12 piece bucket 12-02-2011 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Par71 (Post 88491)
I find Standard Hip Action to be conducive of a Shoulder Turn Takeaway. That "perceptible slackness in the Hip and Shoulder relationship", which Lynn referred to above, can IMO easily cause the Hands to move back too low and too much inside.

That's not saying that you cannot produce wonderful Swings with Standard Hip Action. And I agree that the slackness in the Hip/Shoulder relationship seems to fit the Swinger's pattern, particularly the Dragging Clubhead Takeaway. But much more difficult to master than Delayed Hip Action.

I say MAYBE on this one.....if you have a flatter shoulder turn...the the club can go low and under....have a look at AP...hands in with steeper shoulders.

12 piece bucket 12-02-2011 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Par71 (Post 88491)
I find Standard Hip Action to be conducive of a Shoulder Turn Takeaway. That "perceptible slackness in the Hip and Shoulder relationship", which Lynn referred to above, can IMO easily cause the Hands to move back too low and too much inside.

That's not saying that you cannot produce wonderful Swings with Standard Hip Action. And I agree that the slackness in the Hip/Shoulder relationship seems to fit the Swinger's pattern, particularly the Dragging Clubhead Takeaway. But much more difficult to master than Delayed Hip Action.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Par71 (Post 88500)
At Address or at Impact Fix (which, of course, could be one and the same if you're using Impact Address)?

Options of course...but more of an adjusted address look...if you keep your arms soft and move your body around you'll note the change in the handle location....I'd say preturn the right hip and actually pre-straighten the right knee some too...should pull the handle to the point where your hands look more address attitude than fix.

whip 12-02-2011 05:18 PM

One thing to note on the angle of approach, hitting ARBITRARILY requires 10-5-e closed plane line the listing for the angle of approach procedure is the hitting basic pattern. Also par71s questions are very well pointed, AP has quite a bit of hip turn there and is going on to end.....wouldn't this require a switch to an arc of approach procedure....

Also I would agree with you par71 in that delayed hip action will help the golfer get up the plane better versus a tendency to drag it under(shoulder turn takeaway) with standard hip action along with my previous reasons I believe this to be why he recommended delayed hip action for the swingers basic pattern



Definition of arbitrary

Based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system.
(of power or a ruling body) Unrestrained and autocratic in the use of authority.

In other words it may require it if thats what it takes to accomplish it but it does not absolutely require a closed plane line which is very minimal anyway

MizunoJoe 12-02-2011 06:13 PM

Let's throw some gasoline on the campfire
 
Arnold Palmer wasn't a Hitter, he swung the club.

It's August 1970, I get to the course early for the first round of the PGA Championship. The range only has a handful of players with two of them on the far right side. Back when, there were no ropes, just respectful fans. I sit down in the grass not more than 15 feet behind the two players who happen to be Gary Player and Arnold Palmer. Player is incessantly peppering Palmer with questions about the grip and Palmer grunts short, inaudible answers, appearing to be annoyed. He is taking giant beaver pelt divots and showering me with dirt and grass as there's a wind out of the West. Back then, of course, I didn't know Hitting from Swinging, but I remember clearly this muscular whirling dervish raking the balls with his massive shoulders - a veritable human g-machine centrifuge. Looking back 41 yrs later, I know I was watching a Swinger.

12 piece bucket 12-02-2011 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MizunoJoe (Post 88508)
Arnold Palmer wasn't a Hitter, he swung the club.

It's August 1970, I get to the course early for the first round of the PGA Championship. The range only has a handful of players with two of them on the far right side. Back when, there were no ropes, just respectful fans. I sit down in the grass not more than 15 feet behind the two players who happen to be Gary Player and Arnold Palmer. Player is incessantly peppering Palmer with questions about the grip and Palmer grunts short, inaudible answers, appearing to be annoyed. He is taking giant beaver pelt divots and showering me with dirt and grass as there's a wind out of the West. Back then, of course, I didn't know Hitting from Swinging, but I remember clearly this muscular whirling dervish raking the balls with his massive shoulders - a veritable human g-machine centrifuge. Looking back 41 yrs later, I know I was watching a Swinger.

Oh boy...........

Delaware Golf 12-02-2011 10:04 PM

Standard Hip Action in the 7th Edition
 
According to Tom Tomasello Standard Hip Action was suppose to be the 10-15 Hip Action for both the swinging and hitting patterns for the 7th edition. Tom assembled a complete 7th edition with Homer's notes. It appears Joe Daniels did the same thing. Tom had that revision completed by the late 80's. Tom instructed his students to change 10-15-B to 10-15-A in the book. When I studied with Tommy, I came to the lessons with delayed hip action, by the time I left (I have it on audio tape)I was learning standard hip action. Trust me, I'm definitely clearing my right hip, combined with the magic of the right forearm action, I have a very stable and reliable backswing.

I use Standard Hip Action for both swinging and hitting with equally good results. I have no desire to go back to delayed hip action. You have to go with what works, I believe Homer would be in agreement.


Great exchange going on in this thread. :golf:

DG

12 piece bucket 12-02-2011 10:58 PM

Two obvious Swingers.....




whip 12-02-2011 11:36 PM

practical insight
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Delaware Golf (Post 88513)
According to Tom Tomasello Standard Hip Action was suppose to be the 10-15 Hip Action for both the swinging and hitting patterns for the 7th edition. Tom assembled a complete 7th edition with Homer's notes. It appears Joe Daniels did the same thing. Tom had that revision completed by the late 80's. Tom instructed his students to change 10-15-B to 10-15-A in the book. When I studied with Tommy, I came to the lessons with delayed hip action, by the time I left (I have it on audio tape)I was learning standard hip action. Trust me, I'm definitely clearing my right hip, combined with the magic of the right forearm action, I have a very stable and reliable backswing.

I use Standard Hip Action for both swinging and hitting with equally good results. I have no desire to go back to delayed hip action. You have to go with what works, I believe Homer would be in agreement.


Great exchange going on in this thread. :golf:

DG

great practical insight here...

As a swinger who tends to overswing, i prefer delayed hip action. It helps me set up the lag and drag in the backstroke for all components in the downstroke. I prefer the sequence to be arms, shoulders, hips, knees then feet in the backstroke. By reversing that sequence in the downstroke, this extends the swing radius to the feet, which resists impact deceleration (think of pivot lag in both directions as a kind of extensor action for the pivot).

Par71 12-03-2011 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket (Post 88504)
Options of course...but more of an adjusted address look...if you keep your arms soft and move your body around you'll note the change in the handle location....I'd say preturn the right hip and actually pre-straighten the right knee some too...should pull the handle to the point where your hands look more address attitude than fix.

I think I understand you now, 12pb:

You do not try to fix in your mind the (original) Right Forearm Angle of Approach at Impact Fix (or at Address before preturning the Hips) and then preturn the Hips until the line between your Left Knee and your Right Hip becomes parallel to that (remembered) angle.

Instead, you pre-turn the Hips at Adjusted Address (and also pre-straighten the Right Knee) until the line from the Left Knee to the Right Hip is parallel to the Right Forearm Angle of Approach that results from that preturn. So you can simply check these alignments by looking down after the preturn.:cool:

Par71 12-03-2011 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Delaware Golf (Post 88513)
According to Tom Tomasello Standard Hip Action was suppose to be the 10-15 Hip Action for both the swinging and hitting patterns for the 7th edition. Tom assembled a complete 7th edition with Homer's notes.

DG, I was about to ask you this before:

I seem to remember that you wrote in other threads that in the 7th edition Hip Action for the Basic Stroke Patterns had been changed from Delayed to Standard. Were you referring to that draft 7th edition that Tom Tomasello assembled, or is this really somewhere in the final 7th edition?

whip 12-03-2011 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Par71 (Post 88518)
DG, I was about to ask you this before:

I seem to remember that you wrote in other threads that in the 7th edition Hip Action for the Basic Stroke Patterns had been changed from Delayed to Standard. Were you referring to that draft 7th edition that Tom Tomasello assembled, or is this really somewhere in the final 7th edition?

refer to ch. 12 of your own 7th edition IT IS NOT STANDARD

Par71 12-03-2011 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whip (Post 88519)
refer to ch. 12 of your own 7th edition IT IS NOT STANDARD

That's why I asked.

12 piece bucket 12-03-2011 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Par71 (Post 88517)
I think I understand you now, 12pb:

You do not try to fix in your mind the (original) Right Forearm Angle of Approach at Impact Fix (or at Address before preturning the Hips) and then preturn the Hips until the line between your Left Knee and your Right Hip becomes parallel to that (remembered) angle.

Instead, you pre-turn the Hips at Adjusted Address (and also pre-straighten the Right Knee) until the line from the Left Knee to the Right Hip is parallel to the Right Forearm Angle of Approach that results from that preturn. So you can simply check these alignments by looking down after the preturn.:cool:

YES SIR....

Pre-turn and pre-straighten to allow the abruptly inward hand path as dictated by the AOA...







AOA...10-5-E....inward.....people have made a point that your hands can go too low and underplane...so how do you "adjust" to this inward direction? You are seeing the model...in my mind...

AP's hands are IN but his clubhead is in and UP...how is this accomplished? Sweetspot up and deep hands below shoulder line and deep?

1. Palmer had a MASSIVE amount of hip turn (facilitated by an almost hyper extended right knee and bent left knee) allowing his right shoulder and right hip to reach deeeeep. BUT...why not underplane?

2. The inward component is from the TURNING PIVOT

3. The upward component is from the loading of the right elbow...Palmer elevated the club by bending his right elbow (as well as fanning and retracting it...more inward componet)

4. More upward from the LENGTHENING of his entire right side...right shoulder deep and high ...right hip deep and high...right leg long.....left side compressed....also allowing a centered motion with the AOA geometry...his right shoulder is not really "flat to the plane"...it is more UP AND DEEP to the plane...adjusted 10-5-E AOA plane...more in and steeper

He IS NOT getting up by LIFTING...he is not raising his right humerus bone off his body....this allows his hands and the primary lever assembly to stay BELOW his right shoulder...he can immediately LAUNCH the lever assemblies and wedge structure down AND OUT on plane....his right shoulder is ON TOP of the left arm being the upper leg of the primary lever...providing the initial acceleration and then the LAUNCHING PAD

You'll note if you put yourself in a top position (minus the archy left wrist) like Palmer with one of them ninja sticks or a dowel on the ground aproximating the AOA...your LEFT ARM will also be approximately parallel to the AOA at top...right shoulder and hip joints deep and high...no elevating the club by lifting the arms off the rib cage...upward from the loading of the right elbow..no right wrist cock disrupting the wedges...upward from a long and deep right side..reaching BACK AND STRIVING FOR HEIGHT....

Note the height of the right shoulders and shoulder slant difference....this is basically the difference between pitch and punch elbow and what it does to the rate that you achieve your axis tilt...



Have a look at the swing at the 1:30 mark...BEAUTIFUL...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDDWd5vVl0Q&feature=player_detailpage#t=90 s

KevCarter 12-03-2011 08:55 AM

Great analysis Bucket, difficult to do with Arnie because he never seemed to swing it the same way twice in a row! Mr. Palmer never tried to be pretty, it was all about playing the game and posting up a number...

Palmer always looked like he was "holding off" that driver, afraid of the hook. Possibly because he was a little under plane? A little under like Stricker, but he just plays for the draw and let's her buck!

I haven't studied much footage of Mr. Player, but his swing sure looked sweet in that video. Very under rated...

Really enjoying this thread!

Kevin

Par71 12-03-2011 09:25 AM

Great job, Bucket.:clap:

12 piece bucket 12-03-2011 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Par71 (Post 88524)
Great job, Bucket.:clap:

It AIN'T me........evil diabolical genius of EC.....bullet proof aoa elbow plane drive out hitting pattern

2-J-3 aoa geometry matching
10-2-D-ish grip with pressure points and left thumb aligned aft along LCOG matching
preturned prestraightened right hip address matching
inward hand path matching
knee action matching
deep turn right hip action matching
steep shoulder turn matching
right elbow right forearm flying wedge compliant loading
matching hands and left arm underneath dual action right shoulder matching
centered launching pad pivot matching
right shoulder releasing over primary lever matching
release type matching
thrown over sweetspot matching
angled hinge action matching
down plane way forward axis tilt springing up full radius brought to bare on ball radius extend from feet-ankles-knees-hips-spine-right elbow-fully uncocked left wrist throw out and over.

Delaware Golf 12-03-2011 01:13 PM

Notes for the 7th Edition
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Par71 (Post 88518)
DG, I was about to ask you this before:

I seem to remember that you wrote in other threads that in the 7th edition Hip Action for the Basic Stroke Patterns had been changed from Delayed to Standard. Were you referring to that draft 7th edition that Tom Tomasello assembled, or is this really somewhere in the final 7th edition?

So you have ask yourself did the notes for the 7th edition say standard hip action or was that a conversation between Homer and Tomasello...and if the notes said Standard Hip Action did Joe Daniels make the decision to retain delayed hip action in the stroke patterns. Good question for Joe Daniels? I got to believe Joe Daniels and Tom Tomasello had the same set of 7th edition updates, in the 7th edition text Joe Daniels mentions 90 pages of notes and Tommy mentioned the same amount. You would have to assume that Sally Kelley probably provided Tom and Joe copies of those notes. Tom Tomasello painstakingly put those updates into a copy of the 6th edition. Tommy knew that book inside and out...

With my backswing, I'm sensing both the right hip action and the action of the hands per the straight line delivery path per the #3 pressure point. I'm hitting the ball long and straight, consistently. Why?

If I use Right Forearm Takeaway (trying to keep right arm straight, wide arc), I lose my pivot angle/waist bend, that condition is called bobbing. If I use Magic of the Right Forearm takeaway (bending or levering the right elbow at the start of the backswing) with delayed hip action that puts an excessive amount of pressure on the right elbow. The backstroke motion that Tommy taught; Magic of the Right Forearm and Standard Hip action solved all of my backswing issues. I'm swinging within myself and retaining the three most important angles.

1) Knee flex
2) Maintaining Waist Bend
3) The Right Wrist conditon (Bent and Level)

I believe this is a process an AI should be taking you through.

DG

KevCarter 12-03-2011 02:35 PM

DG, do you like to work out of the 6th or 7th?

Delaware Golf 12-03-2011 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevCarter (Post 88529)
DG, do you like to work out of the 6th or 7th?

Spent a lot of time with the 6th during the 90's, today, I go between the 2nd/6th/7th. I'm in the market for the 3rd edition. Really like the putting stroke pattern in the 2nd.

DG

KevCarter 12-03-2011 04:06 PM

I've heard others say they enjoy the 3rd edition. I've not seen a copy, and understand they fetch a pretty penny. So far, I enjoy the 6th.

Kevin

Yoda 12-04-2011 12:20 AM

Matchmaker Matchmaker
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket (Post 88526)
It AIN'T me........evil diabolical genius of EC.....bullet proof aoa elbow plane drive out hitting pattern

2-J-3 aoa geometry matching
10-2-D-ish grip with pressure points and left thumb aligned aft along LCOG matching
preturned prestraightened right hip address matching
inward hand path matching
knee action matching
deep turn right hip action matching
steep shoulder turn matching
right elbow right forearm flying wedge compliant loading
matching hands and left arm underneath dual action right shoulder matching
centered launching pad pivot matching
right shoulder releasing over primary lever matching
release type matching
thrown over sweetspot matching
angled hinge action matching
down plane way forward axis tilt springing up full radius brought to bare on ball radius extend from feet-ankles-knees-hips-spine-right elbow-fully uncocked left wrist throw out and over.

Bucket,

To you and Eddie . . .

Thanks!

:occasion:

12 piece bucket 12-04-2011 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 88539)
Bucket,

To you and Eddie . . .

Thanks!

:occasion:

Pinehurst........calling..........for........reuni on???? Yellow Book Ressurection Up From The Grave It AROOOOSE!!!! WITH A MIGHTY TRIUMPH O'RE ITS FOES!!!! IT AROSE A VICTOR FROM THE DARK DOMAIN!!! IT WILL LIVE FOREVER IN GEOMETRIC REIGN!!!

KevCarter 12-04-2011 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket (Post 88540)
Pinehurst........calling..........for........reuni on???? Yellow Book Ressurection Up From The Grave It AROOOOSE!!!! WITH A MIGHTY TRIUMPH O'RE ITS FOES!!!! IT AROSE A VICTOR FROM THE DARK DOMAIN!!! IT WILL LIVE FOREVER IN GEOMETRIC REIGN!!!

All is right with the world again!!! :salut: :salut: :salut:

danattherock 12-13-2011 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket (Post 88499)
Sure....Eddie Cox has developed something along these lines I believe to be a FANTASTIC HITTING pattern....you pre-turn the hips in an amount to approximate the angle of approach...which is basically approximated by your on plane right forearm at address...so in your LOOK LOOK LOOK process you are observing with the pre-turn...the line from your left knee to right hip joint is approximately parallel to the angle of approach 2-J-3 style on the ground....this 3-D imaginary line approximates the direction of your backstroke hand path....those King lines are the MODEL TOP for this particular pattern (less "visually flat left wrist" though ...more geometrically flat). But if you look at the King...he achieved these alignments more in dynamic fashion...but I think it would be much easier with the pre-turn to establish these lines at address...that's where you is going...so why not start there...then all of your path/delivery is right there for you to LOOK LOOK LOOK at...you have an approximation of "this is the path my hands must travel on". GOOD STUFF....



Unfortunately I can only understand about 10% of the above goobledygook. I did however hit a 2/3 swing PW with Eddie's "hitting pattern" today as far as I normally hit a PW with a full swing. There is some meat on this bone, even I can see. Today was our first of many lessons. I got a lot to learn, but the hour I spent today is a huge step in the right direction.


[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56STh7fVx1U&list=UUarTiQGGapZlRRGsESNduKA& feature=plcp[/video]




-Dan

12 piece bucket 12-13-2011 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by danattherock (Post 88770)
Unfortunately I can only understand about 10% of the above goobledygook. I did however hit a 2/3 swing PW with Eddie's "hitting pattern" today as far as I normally hit a PW with a full swing. There is some meat on this bone, even I can see. Today was our first of many lessons. I got a lot to learn, but the hour I spent today is a huge step in the right direction.


[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56STh7fVx1U&list=UUarTiQGGapZlRRGsESNduKA& feature=plcp[/video]




-Dan

ahhhh yes....Eddie talked to me about you today! Congrats...Hand path looking pretty good on the backstroke!

Did Eddie give you the "hammering" drill? You got too much under release on that downswing...but man you have made a nice start on the backswing! Stick with it!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:35 PM.