![]() |
Quote:
Go ahead YodasLuke... ...thrill us with your acumen! |
Quote:
If you continue to trace a straight plane line with the Hands and have proper rhythm (TGM definition of course), the Pivot will move the hands to the inside-visually to the left. And without any independent Hand movement that this axiom wrong implies to many. Forward? Good question DG. I don’t know. I think the linear motion to the ball was implied where as the Down and Out on Plane to Joe Duffer isn’t?? |
cheap shot:naughty:
|
Quote:
I hope Ted comes with his thoughts on this matter. My thoughts would be that people do not have enough down and out. In their attempts to hit it far they add more forward to the already existing, and thereby "forgets" about the down. In most cases, they do not know that an out exists. Hereby Mr. Kelleys stresses the importance of, perhaps, the 2 most important elements of the 3D downstroke. But then again, it is only my interpretation.....I could be wrong |
Quote:
Isn't that why people use visual equivalents.... isn't that what VJ does with his "Putting arc"... the arc is same as placing balls on the ground / arc on a mat surely...? The best i have got is using a half plane board and keeping left flat /right bent wrists from release to follow through... no reason why you can't use a transparent board and paper underneath and mark on it where your specifc visual equivalents are with a particular club... use the illusions to allow you to perform geometry.... Tracing lines with lasers i find less worthwhile than planeboads... the plane angle can vary so much with lasers... at least in my hands.... whole of he clubshaft lies on flat plane.... keeps same angle better at least during release to follow through... |
exactly my intent
Quote:
It is the axiom that I find to be beneath contempt. I, honestly, could care less who teaches such things. I will not. It's frustrating enough for me to hear the things that people have been told (even more so when they can accomplish them). So, I know it's frustrating for someone like this guy that was pounding 7 irons 100 yards. :eyes: Not that anyone wants to take this a step further, but, the visual arc sharpens as the plane shallows. And, the visual arc straightens as the plane becomes steeper. Ultimately, it can become a visually straight line in the Angle of Approach Procedure. The points are simply these: 1. Most see Low Point and Impact as the same thing. 2. Telling someone to swing left has no geometric basis and will encourage the bypassing of Low Point (encouraging for 1st point). But, if you'd like to encourage Roundhousing, it's an incomparable suggestion. 3. The degree of visual curvature is based in the steepness of the plane. |
Chapter 5
Quote:
On page 64 in the 7th edition, he gives the alternative (pivot controlled hands). With this procedure, he is less than encouraging. I love the sentence at the bottom: "However, if the Clubhead is Monitored directly instead of through the Hands, it is, as always, a chronic disaster." I guess that sums it up. Thanks Homer. |
Quote:
Nice 'un! Make the world go 'round in circles . . . make it fly high like a bird up in the sky. |
Quote:
Love this post! #3 is very over looked when people say go left. Not to take away from the total view of what may work for a low handicap player who may get the low point ( I would hope) I have seen a few of the guys from this camp of thought. But they always have sand on the SW from the left bunker. |
Umbrella Avoidance
3 Attachment(s)
I took these three photos on the Practice Tee at the PODS Championship in Palm Harbor, Florida, two weeks ago. They illustrate V.J. Singh's new 'avoidance behavior' setup.
I'll put up a post on this subject tomorrow or Tuesday. Meanswhile, consider them food for thought. Check the divot direction in Photo #2 and V.J.'s reaction to the results in #3. Hint: He was hitting big cuts. Slices even. :eyes: |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:51 AM. |