![]() |
Re: Look at batters
Quote:
|
Re: Structure and a return to physics
Quote:
Seems that you may be miss identifying the major flail of the golf swing which is formed by the left arm and club. Alternatively you may be misinterpreting somehow :roll: that I would be suggesting, after much discussion of flailing that the rigid structure of arms would remove flailing. This is not the case. Think extensor action. If however you are suggesting that the firm attachment of the left arm to shoulder excludes the flailing of a flail formed by the lever from the spine to shoulder (roughly) and the left arm, that is true but a secondary effect in power generation. Golfie |
Re: Look at batters
Quote:
Seeing as how most homerun hitters are dead pull hitters, even if he's starts off sqared away , he's still about 35 degrees closed to his target line to start. Barry does have amazing lag. Seeing this is very humbling and explains why I could never hit a softball very far in the corporate league. After all these years of golf, I could never imagine trying to be so open at impact. As a result, poor rotation. a quitting stroke to be sure. Golfie |
"Mid-body tension does not do anything other than cause discomfort."
](*,) |
Re: Golfer's Flail
Quote:
-hcw |
hcw,
=D> |
Re: Look at batters
Quote:
|
Re: Structure and a return to physics
Quote:
I may have "misinterpreted" what you were saying and probably still do. :? However, the point I was trying to make is that a rigid spoke/arm attached to a spindle/torso, which is what I thought you were referring to, would not generate anywhere near the speed by rotation of the spindle that our golfing flailis capable of. Our golfing flail requires no rotary motion to generate, and transfer, its power from top to bottom. This is done by the straightening of the assembly to its in-line condition: arm power in hitting and centripetal force in swinging. As Homer was fond of reminding us, the golf swing is a body transported - not powered - arm swing. |
Quote:
A Cricketer's throw, like a baseball pitch or baseball Outfielders throw, also begins from a position perpendicular, not square, to the intended line of flight of the ball. Neither baseball Outfielders or Cricketers (who, arguably, throw as flat and fast as your average pitcher) find it necessary, or advantageous, to precede the release of the ball by the lifting, and waving about in the air, of the front foot. Such a motion has no mechanical advantage whatsoever, no matter how macho it appears to be. A "throw" is a throw, is a throw. Strike out! :wink: |
Re: Structure and a return to physics
Quote:
-hcw |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:57 PM. |