![]() |
yodas luke, how are you. hope you are having a great holiday season,,,,,,,,,,,,,,what some people here are looking for is not being discussed. on other websites they are discussing the two ways to release the clubhead. one method calls it cp or cf release. another calls it hitting with leverage or slinging the clubhead. it is not just about the right shoulder. what people are wanting to know is how to get to hogans positions instead of vj singh's thru the impact area. is there any difference in what one needs to do to accomplish the two differnt positions at impact?
|
Theory of 'Facivity'
Quote:
It is very difficult for the ball to bounce off the face of the club in any direction other than that which the clubface is looking. :idea1: |
HUH? do what?
|
The "Not-So-New" Ball Flight Laws
Quote:
Chip and I were just referencing the "new" Ball Flight Laws. Recent 'scientific' means have 'discovered' that the initial direction of the ball is, in Homer Kelley's words more than forty years ago, "practically at right angles to the Clubface". Please pardon our tongue-in-cheek exchange. :salut: |
Tall Guys and Short Guys
Quote:
:shock: To be sure, Swing Plane is not determined solely by height -- witness Matt Kuchar -- but, that fact should definitely not be left out of the equation. :salut: Having written the above, it now occurs to me that Swing Plane and its influencing Component Alignments -- the overriding theme of this thread -- may not be the "positions" you are referencing. In fact, since I'm not following the "other websites" to which you refer, I must admit that I have no idea what you're talking about. Please specify the alignments you seek to differentiate. Thanks! :smile: |
Quote:
But the truth is you and Yoda also informed me......and so I must ask you both to please keep on preaching to us here. For those who think this exchange to be dogma or back slapping, Id suggest that is really geometry. Not golf geometry or golf gobbldy goop just plain old geometry of the circle. It knows not golf, it just is. |
cp or cf
Quote:
I also know that this method has deep TGM roots. In the limited amount of CP and CF information to which I've been privy, it seems as if it's an expansion on Plane Line Tracing. From a Square Stance, the golfer would be able to trace multiple Plane Lines to the left of the target and multiple Plane Lines to the right of the target. But, each Plane Line is still a line. Personally: I prefer to rely on the same Plane Line and Stance Line relationship, with varying degrees of Angle of Attack based on the length of the club. If I change my Plane Line, I also change my Stance Line to match. In order to create curvature, I adjust my Grip to Clubface. Unless it's a specialty shot, I find little need for having 7 Plane Lines for every club in my bag. I like the Machine Concept. And, I'm not going to exclude 1-L-19. I'm not trying to cloud the water, but it's difficult to get too deep into this conversation about the two positions without considering many things: Golfer's stature, shallow or steep Angle of Attack, camera location, Steering, single Plane or bent Plane, Inside-Out, Outside-In, is Clubface affecting Plane, etc., etc., etc. |
Back On Track
Quote:
Kevin |
Double Your Pleasure
Quote:
|
2-f
I think the assumption that the hands and the clubhead are moved on the same plane is preventing us to fully understand what's really going on in Hogan's swing.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:58 PM. |